RESEARCH PAPER

ForeTime-VLA: Causal Future-Token Distillation from a World Action Model for Conveyor-Belt Manipulation

Ma, Siyuan; Zhang, Yutian; Zhang, Boshi; Wu, Qinglian; Zhai, Jiaqi; Wei, Dong; Huang, Xiaojin

Classification

View four quadrants
Major category
WAMs
Architecture
Dual-system
Prediction paradigm
IDM
Source review status
Verified from primary sources
AT A GLANCE

Contribution

We introduce ForeTime-VLA, a dense pi0.5 policy that distills a future-aware, action-equivalent representation from a frozen Fast-WAM-derived teacher while remaining causal at inference. In quantitative real-robot evaluation, ForeTime-VLA achieves 81.1% stationary and 58.9% slow-moving grasp success, exceeding the next-best reference by 12.2 and 22.2 percentage points, respectively.

Abstract

Manipulating moving objects requires a policy to anticipate contact events, yet vision-language-action (VLA) policies are commonly fine-tuned from the current observation alone. World action models (WAMs) learn predictive dynamics, but running a video-scale teacher or explicitly imagining future frames at deployment is costly. We introduce ForeTime-VLA, a dense pi0.5 policy that distills a future-aware, action-equivalent representation from a frozen Fast-WAM-derived teacher while remaining causal at inference. Offline, current and future video latents are compressed into a whitened 64-D target. Online, an eight-frame history encoder predicts this target together with manipulation phase and normalized time-to-transition. Four future tokens and one phase token condition the VLM prefix, while the predicted future and transition horizon condition the action expert. Training retains the original flow-matching action target and adds cosine, relational geometry, phase, time-to-transition, and action-equivalence objectives. On a deduplicated conveyor-belt dataset, we compare 40k-step checkpoints on 768 matched windows per split. Test MAE decreases from 0.134119 to 0.130593 (2.63%; paired-bootstrap 95% CI: 0.82-4.48% improvement), and test L2 decreases by 3.02%, at a 2.46-2.93% latency cost. In quantitative real-robot evaluation, ForeTime-VLA achieves 81.1% stationary and 58.9% slow-moving grasp success, exceeding the next-best reference by 12.2 and 22.2 percentage points, respectively. Across three belt speeds, it completes 44/90 grasps versus 23/90 for pi0.5, including 11/30 versus 2/30 at fast speed. The agreement between offline orientation gains and reduced real-robot contact-pose failures supports causal future-token distillation as an effective way to improve dynamic manipulation without deploying the world-model teacher.

Affiliations

Tsinghua University, Beijing, China; Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Shanghai, China; Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China; Hangzhou Yunshenchu Technology Co., Ltd. (DEEP Robotics), Hangzhou, China